The Apostle Paul tells us in Ephesians 4:17-19 that the true
Christian no longer conducts
himself (or herself) like the non-Christian. He then actually lists a few
characteristics that can really be boiled down to three traits. First, the Old
Man is characterized Intellectual
Deficiency (v. 17b), and, second, Spiritual Debility (v. 18).
Third, which we
started last time, the Old
Man is characterized by Moral Depravity
(v. 19). Who being past feeling have
given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with
greediness. The
latter part of the verse describes the practical outworking of moral depravity:
Consider three
characteristics.
1. Lasciviousness
(aselgeia) speaks of unrestrained self-indulgence, especially in sexual
sin. The Greek root behind uncleanness is katharos, which means
clean or pure, so with the prefix (a) added (akatharos), it forms
the opposite: “the whole realm of uncleanness, ranging from menstruation to
moral pollution through wrongdoing.”
Actually,
in fact, that is putting it delicately. The debauchery of the ancient world was
beyond comprehension. As one scholar comments: “The refinements of art too
often ministered to such groveling pursuits. The naked statues of the goddesses
were not exempted from rape, and many pictures of their divinities were but the
excitements of sensual gratification . . . There was a brisk female trade in
potions to induce sterility and barrenness. In fact, one dares not describe the
forms, and scenes, and temptations of impurity, or even translate what
classical poets and historians have revealed without a blush.”
One such
poet was the famous 1st and 2nd Century Roman poet
Juvenal, whose sixteen Satires, especially the Sixth, were graphic
depictions of and scathing attacks on the moral perversion of the Empire. In
one place he wrote, “What neighborhood does not reek with filthy
practices?” Satire ii, 8). Another poet of the day, Martial, wrote, “Long have
I been searching the city through to find if there is ever a maid to say ‘No;’
there is not one” (Ep. iv, 71.). Worse, homosexuality and sodomy were considered
acceptable and normal behavior. Is it any wonder that the Roman Empire fell and
why our own nation is following suit?
The same
was true of the Greeks, as the Ephesians were quite aware. Due in part to the
fact of the pagan temple of Artemis (or Diana), Ephesus was a leading
city in debauchery and sexual immorality. Some historians view it as the most
perverted city of Asia Minor. The rituals and ceremonies merely justified the
perversion of the people’s hearts. Every indulgent sexual practice was common
and condoned. Artemis was, in fact, a goddess of sex, which was served by
thousands of temple prostitutes, eunuchs, singers, dancers, priests, and
priestesses. Even the pagan 5th Century B.C. Greek philosopher
Heraclitus referred to Ephesus as “the darkness of vileness. The morals were
lower than animals and the inhabitants of Ephesus were fit only to be drowned.”
The general behavior of the Greeks was equally wretched.
Theft was dishonorable only when the thief failed to conceal it. In other
words, “It’s okay as long as you don’t get caught.” While they prided
themselves in philosophy, and professed to desire truth, Truth was, in reality,
not a priority. 4th Century B.C. poet Menander lays down the general
rule “that a lie is better than a hurtful truth.” The so-called great Plato
allows us to lie as needed, as long as we do it at the proper time. 600 years
later, this philosophy remained unchanged. 2nd Century philosopher
Maximus Tyrius asserted, “There is nothing decorous in truth, save when it is
profitable, and sometimes a lie is profitable, and truth injurious to men.” In
the 4th Century, philosopher Proclus likewise asserted that “good is
better than truth,” a philosophy we are hearing today even among
evangelicals. During the same period, historian Herodotus records the
common teaching of the day that, “When telling a lie is profitable, tell it!”
These examples are more than sufficient to justify Paul in his condemnation of
the crimes and corruptions of the heathen world. So important is this, in fact,
that He returns to it later in verses 22 and 25-32, as will we. We’ll conclude
next time.
No comments:
Post a Comment